Are rotary mixers better?
djmag.com
Are rotary mixers better?
1–10 of 68 posts
Re: Are rotary mixers better?
#2What, no discussion of knob size, knurl, and operating torque?
At this point it's mostly a user interface problem.
Re: Are rotary mixers better?
#3Any headline with a question...
Of course it depends on what you want to do and what you are used to.
Technically, regardless of the rest of the product design there are high quality potentiometers available both as linear faders or rotary knobs. I guess dirt is more likely to get into a linear fader and make it scratchy - especially in a club environment.
Re: Are rotary mixers better?
#4You can't do (or it is much more involved) to do cuts with rotary knobs. So they serve only the DJ who does slow mixes, while with faders you can do both.
Re: Are rotary mixers better?
#5I actually have a Taula 2 and a Xone 92 at home. I prefer the Taula 2, due to the simplicity and the fact that it has an isolator. The Xone 92 has a four band IQ and a filter, which I like a lot, but I have the impression that all the bells and whistles take a toll on the quality. At least in a home listening setup.
Anyways, it’s not the knobs that make the sound…
Re: Are rotary mixers better?
#6Oh. I first thought it would be about blenders and thought "what other principles would be there?"
Re: Are rotary mixers better?
#7You can't do (or it is much more involved) to do cuts with rotary knobs. So they serve only the DJ who does slow mixes, while with faders you can do both.
Can’t by design. It’s a different process. You can’t get the same smooth transitions as easily with the light faders on pioneer djms (the standard).
Re: Are rotary mixers better?
#8The title is a bit misleading IMHO. It's more like analog vs digital.
After all, from an electrical point of view they're usually just potentiometers and you can build them either as rotary or as linear potentiometers, but it's just a wiper on a resistive conductive track... (of course there are exceptions that work differently and use hall effect or optical sensors).
The article only talks about the actual circuit that is behind that potentiometer.
Having built some MIDI controllers myself in the past, I noticed that rotary potentiometers allow you to better "decouple" arm/shoulder movements from hand/finger movements. I.e. when you're standing and and holding that knob, It's easier to make precise adjustments when there's a rotary knob you can "hold on to" and slowly twist your fingers, whereas with a linear potentiometer I usually have to keep a finger on the surface next to the knob to "compensate" for involuntary movements coming from my body and arm...
Re: Are rotary mixers better?
#9You can't do (or it is much more involved) to do cuts with rotary knobs. So they serve only the DJ who does slow mixes, while with faders you can do both.
Yeah, maybe if that DJ ignores the crossfader.
Re: Are rotary mixers better?
#10Not in a computer UI.
It's depressing that audio software still widely subjects users to this skeuomorphic failure, trying to do everything with on-screen "knobs." Ugh.