Wallpaper apps should not use subscription models
endlesswallpapers.com
Wallpaper apps should not use subscription models
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Wallpaper apps should not use subscription models
#2Nor should anyone use a fucking wallpaper app.
Re: Wallpaper apps should not use subscription models
#3Nor should anyone use a fucking wallpaper app.
I kinda like the bing daily wallpapers extension for GNOME. I suppose that's different as it's managed by a 3rd party.
Re: Wallpaper apps should not use subscription models
#4Nor should anyone use a fucking wallpaper app.
Just use the default wallpaper right?
Re: Wallpaper apps should not use subscription models
#5Nice, I don't think I would every pay for an app like that directly, but being able to play around with text to image AI generation for free is kind of neat :)
Re: Wallpaper apps should not use subscription models
#6Description on App Store says “Iphone” then “iPhone”. One of the images says “compatable” (you mean “compatible”). “Pixe-perfect” does not mean what you think it does¹. AI-generated images can never be pixel perfect because the term implies¹ carefully, meaningfully, and deliberately placing every pixel in its place.
¹ Though the expression is so overused, it basically no longer means anything.