Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
1–10 of 87 posts
Re: Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
#2https://github.com/microsoft/BitNet
"bitnet.cpp achieves speedups of 1.37x to 5.07x on ARM CPUs, with larger models experiencing greater performance gains. Additionally, it reduces energy consumption by 55.4% to 70.0%, further boosting overall efficiency. On x86 CPUs, speedups range from 2.37x to 6.17x with energy reductions between 71.9% to 82.2%. Furthermore, bitnet.cpp can run a 100B BitNet b1.58 model on a single CPU, achieving speeds comparable to human reading (5-7 tokens per second), significantly enhancing the potential for running LLMs on local devices. "
Re: Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
#3Re: Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
#4At that rate it doesn't matter if the first try resulted in an unwanted answer, you'll be able to run once or twice more in a fast succession.
I hope their hardware stays relevant as this field continues to evolve
Re: Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
#5Could someone please bring Microsoft's Bitnet into the discussion and explain how its performance relates to this announcement, if at all? https://github.com/microsoft/BitNet "bitnet.cpp achieves speedups of 1.37x to 5.07x on ARM CPUs, with larger models experiencing greater performance gains. Additionally, it reduces energy consumption by 55.4% to 70.0%, further boosting overall efficiency. On x86 CPUs, speedups ran…
Re: Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
#6Could someone please bring Microsoft's Bitnet into the discussion and explain how its performance relates to this announcement, if at all? https://github.com/microsoft/BitNet "bitnet.cpp achieves speedups of 1.37x to 5.07x on ARM CPUs, with larger models experiencing greater performance gains. Additionally, it reduces energy consumption by 55.4% to 70.0%, further boosting overall efficiency. On x86 CPUs, speedups ran…
Re: Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
#7Damn, that's some impressive speeds. At that rate it doesn't matter if the first try resulted in an unwanted answer, you'll be able to run once or twice more in a fast succession. I hope their hardware stays relevant as this field continues to evolve
Fast iteration is a killer feature, for sure, but at this time I'd rather focus on quality for it to be worthwhile the effort.
Re: Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
#8You need an API key - I got one from https://cloud.cerebras.ai/ but I'm not sure if there's a waiting list at the moment - then you can do this:
pipx install llm # or brew install llm or uv tool install llm
llm install llm-cerebras
llm keys set cerebras
# paste key here
Then you can run lightning fast prompts like this: llm -m cerebras-llama3.1-70b 'an epic tail of a walrus pirate'
Here's a video of that running, it's very speedy: https://static.simonwillison.net/static/2024/cerebras-is-fas...Re: Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
#9Demo, API?
Re: Cerebras Inference now 3x faster: Llama3.1-70B breaks 2,100 tokens/s
#10Damn, that's some impressive speeds. At that rate it doesn't matter if the first try resulted in an unwanted answer, you'll be able to run once or twice more in a fast succession. I hope their hardware stays relevant as this field continues to evolve
The biggest time sink for me is validating answers so not sure I agree on that take. Fast iteration is a killer feature, for sure, but at this time I'd rather focus on quality for it to be worthwhile the effort.
But you're assuming that it'll always ne validated by humans. I'd imagine that most validation (and subsequent processing, especially going forward) will be done on machines.