US Government UAP Footage

Interesting Gimble is in there - much of what is 'interesting' about this video has been debunked by Mick West: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mick_West

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le7Fqbsrrm8

Re: US Government UAP Footage

#5

Post by neom » Mon, Oct 14, 2024, 1:49 PM UTC

Nothing new in there, I always keep an eye on this as it gets updated as the source no matter where the mill is publishing the content generally:

https://www.dvidshub.net/tags/video/uap?view=list&sort=publi...

Re: US Government UAP Footage

#6

Post by chamsom » Mon, Oct 14, 2024, 1:53 PM UTC

ljf wrote: post #4

Interesting Gimble is in there - much of what is 'interesting' about this video has been debunked by Mick West: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mick_West https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le7Fqbsrrm8

"Debunk" lacks scientific significance as the object remains anomalous and unidentified. It infers that this footage is of a "known" object, and any further intellectual inquiry should be suspended.

I think this paper is far more useful to discuss:

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2306/2306.08773.pdf

Re: US Government UAP Footage

#7

Post by ljf » Fri, Oct 18, 2024, 5:21 PM UTC

chamsom wrote: post #6

ljf wrote: post #4

Interesting Gimble is in there - much of what is 'interesting' about this video has been debunked by Mick West: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mick_West https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le7Fqbsrrm8

"Debunk" lacks scientific significance as the object remains anomalous and unidentified. It infers that this footage is of a "known" object, and any further intellectual inquiry should be suspended. I think this paper is far more useful to discuss: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2306/2306.08773.pdf

Debunk Just means to show an assertation as false or expose to ridicule. The idea that the movement is not linked to the movement of the gimbal is shown as incorrect. It is still unidentified, but as I said, much of what is 'interesting' about the video no longer a mystery.