Live data from Hacker News

Who's a Good Boy? A Puppy Linux Mini-Review

bbbhltz.codeberg.page

1–10 of 26 posts

Re: Who's a Good Boy? A Puppy Linux Mini-Review

#5
post #3

Puppy linux was my first linux install back when I was around 13 years old, and I remember it fondly. I recall I even found it easier to get up and running than ubuntu. (Which is somewhat puzzling in hindsight?)

It was my first linux too, also at 13. I still have the boot CD I burned, framed on my wall.

Re: Who's a Good Boy? A Puppy Linux Mini-Review

#6
post #3

Puppy linux was my first linux install back when I was around 13 years old, and I remember it fondly. I recall I even found it easier to get up and running than ubuntu. (Which is somewhat puzzling in hindsight?)

In my experience Ubuntu is one of the harder distros to get working when it doesn't work ootb.

Re: Who's a Good Boy? A Puppy Linux Mini-Review

#8
One thing not mentioned, although it is sort of implied if you are already familiar, is the ability to run Puppy's latest on absolutely ancient hardware.

>General hardware minimum system requirements are:

* CPU Type = x86, x86_64, AMD64

* 32bit Puppy's - CPU = single core Pentium 4 or equiv, RAM = 512mb

* 64bit Puppy's - CPU = 64 bit dual core, RAM = 1gb

Re: Who's a Good Boy? A Puppy Linux Mini-Review

#9
I bow my head to the eternal Puppy Linux.

Not that I want to see the end of Microsoft like many do. In fact, I don't care. But it could be in real trouble if the masses suddenly became aware of simple, easy, and efficient software like Puppy -- which makes people's dependence on MS even more inexplicable.

Post reply on HN