Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
gov.ca.gov
Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
1–10 of 514 posts
Re: Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
#2Perhaps worried that draconian restriction on new technology is not gonna help bring Silicon Valley back to preeminence.
Re: Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
#3Re: Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
#4Related. Others?
OpenAI, Anthropic, Google employees support California AI bill - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41540771 - Sept 2024 (26 comments)
Y Combinator, AI startups oppose California AI safety bill - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40780036 - June 2024 (8 comments)
California AI bill becomes a lightning rod–for safety advocates and devs alike - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40767627 - June 2024 (2 comments)
California Senate Passes SB 1047 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40515465 - May 2024 (42 comments)
California residents: call your legislators about AI bill SB 1047 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40421986 - May 2024 (11 comments)
Misconceptions about SB 1047 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40291577 - May 2024 (35 comments)
California Senate bill to crush OpenAI competitors fast tracked for a vote - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40200971 - April 2024 (16 comments)
SB-1047 will stifle open-source AI and decrease safety - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40198766 - April 2024 (190 comments)
Call-to-Action on SB 1047 – Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40192204 - April 2024 (103 comments)
On the Proposed California SB 1047 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39347961 - Feb 2024 (115 comments)
Re: Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
#5It was a dumb law so... good on a politician for doing the smart thing for once.
Re: Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
#6Perhaps worried that draconian restriction on new technology is not gonna help bring Silicon Valley back to preeminence.
"The Democrat decided to reject the measure because it applies only to the biggest and most expensive AI models and doesn’t take into account whether they are deployed in high-risk situations, he said in his veto message."
That doesn't mean you're wrong, but it's not what Newsom signaled.
Re: Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
#7Perhaps worried that draconian restriction on new technology is not gonna help bring Silicon Valley back to preeminence.
"The Democrat decided to reject the measure because it applies only to the biggest and most expensive AI models and doesn’t take into account whether they are deployed in high-risk situations, he said in his veto message." That doesn't mean you're wrong , but it's not what Newsom signaled.
>and doesn’t take into account whether they are deployed in high-risk situations
Am I out of the loop here? What "high-risk" situations do they have in mind for LLM's?
Re: Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
#8Given what Scott Wiener did with restaurant fees, it's hard to trust his judgement on any legislation. He clearly prioritizes monied interests over the general populace.
Re: Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
"The Democrat decided to reject the measure because it applies only to the biggest and most expensive AI models and doesn’t take into account whether they are deployed in high-risk situations, he said in his veto message." That doesn't mean you're wrong , but it's not what Newsom signaled.
>and doesn’t take into account whether they are deployed in high-risk situations Am I out of the loop here? What "high-risk" situations do they have in mind for LLM's?
Imagine the only thing you know about AI came from the opening voiceover of Terminator 2 and you are a state legislator. Now you understand the origin of this bill perfectly.
Re: Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
#10Also on The Verge: https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/29/24232172/california-ai-sa...