Live data from Hacker News

The Physics of Colliding Balls

vanhunteradams.com

1–10 of 22 posts

Re: The Physics of Colliding Balls

#3
post #2

If you are interested in this topic, the author of pooltool[1], a billiards simulator, has a nice blog series about it [2]. [1] https://github.com/ekiefl/pooltool [2] https://ekiefl.github.io/projects/pooltool/

And here is a video of a robot playing pool:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dS6k0fcniH0

Re: The Physics of Colliding Balls

#4
Unfortunately, this writeup doesn't mention any words like "spin" or "rotation" or "angular", not even to disclaim that those aspects are not presently being addressed. It looks like a great resource for kids in grade 11 or 12 physics.

Re: The Physics of Colliding Balls

#5
post #2

If you are interested in this topic, the author of pooltool[1], a billiards simulator, has a nice blog series about it [2]. [1] https://github.com/ekiefl/pooltool [2] https://ekiefl.github.io/projects/pooltool/

This material deals with spin, unlike the article.

Re: The Physics of Colliding Balls

#6

Unfortunately, this writeup doesn't mention any words like "spin" or "rotation" or "angular", not even to disclaim that those aspects are not presently being addressed. It looks like a great resource for kids in grade 11 or 12 physics.

The intended audience is the author himself.

Edit: You’re reading his notes/summary of the topic. Basically what he’s understood so far. “Expository webpages - For my own future reference. Intended audience is myself.”, see https://vanhunteradams.com/#Expository-webpages

Re: The Physics of Colliding Balls

#8
post #2

If you are interested in this topic, the author of pooltool[1], a billiards simulator, has a nice blog series about it [2]. [1] https://github.com/ekiefl/pooltool [2] https://ekiefl.github.io/projects/pooltool/

This material deals with spin, unlike the article.

It also has illustrations, unlike the article.

Re: The Physics of Colliding Balls

#10
post #6

Unfortunately, this writeup doesn't mention any words like "spin" or "rotation" or "angular", not even to disclaim that those aspects are not presently being addressed. It looks like a great resource for kids in grade 11 or 12 physics.

The intended audience is the author himself. Edit: You’re reading his notes/summary of the topic. Basically what he’s understood so far. “Expository webpages - For my own future reference. Intended audience is myself.” , see https://vanhunteradams.com/#Expository-webpages

Chances are the author is in 11th or 12th grade. And you two might be on the same page.

(Just joking).

Post reply on HN