Live data from Hacker News

Why wordfreq will not be updated

github.com

1–10 of 542 posts

Re: Why wordfreq will not be updated

#5

It might be fun to collect the same data if not for any other reason than to note the changes but adding the caveat that it doesn’t represent human output. Might even change the tool name.

The point was it’s getting harder and harder to do that as things get locked down or go behind a massive paywall to either profit off of or avoid being used in generative AI. The places where previous versions got data is impossible to gather from anymore so the dataset you would collect would be completely different, which (might) cause weird skewing.

Re: Why wordfreq will not be updated

#8
post #5

It might be fun to collect the same data if not for any other reason than to note the changes but adding the caveat that it doesn’t represent human output. Might even change the tool name.

The point was it’s getting harder and harder to do that as things get locked down or go behind a massive paywall to either profit off of or avoid being used in generative AI. The places where previous versions got data is impossible to gather from anymore so the dataset you would collect would be completely different, which (might) cause weird skewing.

But that would always be the case. Twitter will not last forever; heck, it may not even be long before an open alternative like Bluesky competes with it. Would be interesting to know what percentage of the original mined data was from Twitter.

Re: Why wordfreq will not be updated

#10
All those writers who'll soon be out of job and/or already are and basically unhireable for their previous tasks should be paid for by the AI hyperscalers to write anything at all on one condition: not a single sentence in their works should be created with AI.

(I initially wanted to say 'paid for by the government' but that'd be socialising losses and we've had quite enough of that in the past.)

Post reply on HN