Open-source reflection lama 70B beats Claude 3.5 and GPT-4 on benchmarks
reflectionllama.com
Open-source reflection lama 70B beats Claude 3.5 and GPT-4 on benchmarks
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Open-source reflection lama 70B beats Claude 3.5 and GPT-4 on benchmarks
#2[deleted]
Re: Open-source reflection lama 70B beats Claude 3.5 and GPT-4 on benchmarks
#3Related recent discussion:
Reflection 70B, the top open-source model
Re: Open-source reflection lama 70B beats Claude 3.5 and GPT-4 on benchmarks
#4Related recent discussion: Reflection 70B, the top open-source model https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41459781
That's a great conversation about the reflection 70b, but do you still have doubts about whether it's a hype or a game-changer?
The link provided leads to a playground for the reflection llama 70B.
Re: Open-source reflection lama 70B beats Claude 3.5 and GPT-4 on benchmarks
#5I must be missing something but the model is absolutely useless because it's giving unrelated answers.
Check the questions people posted:
Re: Open-source reflection lama 70B beats Claude 3.5 and GPT-4 on benchmarks
#6Related recent discussion: Reflection 70B, the top open-source model https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41459781
That's a great conversation about the reflection 70b, but do you still have doubts about whether it's a hype or a game-changer? The link provided leads to a playground for the reflection llama 70B.
In the Physics of Language Models talk[1], he shows how a LLM trained to be able to backtrack can give much better answers.
However he also points out it has to be included in the initial training, you can't improve a non-backtrack-trained model by finetuning it later.
So seems it's probably the way to go for training new models, but limited applicability to those already trained.