HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
tomshardware.com
HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
1–10 of 185 posts
Re: HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
#2Re: HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
#3Re: HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
#4Does it though? Does it really?
I don't understand this move from HDMI Forum. They're handing a win to DisplayPort.
Re: HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
#5Re: HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
#6(290 points, 6 months ago, 164 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39559318
(394 points, 6 months ago, 237 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39543291
Re: HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
#7Feels like it's time for governments to get involved. It's not reasonable for a ubiquitous format like HDMI to be restricted like this.
Re: HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
#8Feels like it's time for governments to get involved. It's not reasonable for a ubiquitous format like HDMI to be restricted like this.
Between patents, trade secrets, and DMCA, the government is the source of the problem here. Arguably the FTC could step in here but I think they have bigger problems to tackle.
The government created the playing field. The only entity that can fix the situation is the government: they created a bad playing field, and they need to fix it.
Re: HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
#9Re: HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
#10>On the one hand, this move ensures the quality and consistency of HDMI experience. Does it though? Does it really? I don't understand this move from HDMI Forum. They're handing a win to DisplayPort.
Is this useful, if all the relevant devices only have HDMI ports and not DP?