Gemini Ad Backlash
cbsnews.com
Gemini Ad Backlash
1–10 of 14 posts
Re: Gemini Ad Backlash
#2Re: Gemini Ad Backlash
#3I can't recall a technological advancement that capital so badly wanted at labor's expense in my lifetime. There is a desperation to come up with consumer products powered by AI to get them on board, similar to how they got on board with cheap goods via offshore manufacturing, or telecommunication tools that facilitate "calling grandma" that lead to outsourcing.
There really seems to be almost zero consumer products that people want powered by this stuff. Even chatGPT is mostly laborers trying to do their job more easily.
Re: Gemini Ad Backlash
#4This ad immediately made me want to change the channel and I'm glad to see it rotate out.
The idea that AI should write a snarky letter on behalf of a child to their hero makes me sick.
What recipient wants to read an avalanche of AI garbage "from 6 year old fans"? Who would ever respond to this other than to:
Gemini, write a snarky response to this letter you wrote on behalf of this "fan".
Re: Gemini Ad Backlash
#5Highlighting such a bad product use case. Is there anyone who uses LLM’s like this?
I’ve seen this trend where big tech companies so desperately want their product to matter to the most important and emotional things of your life, that they try to shoehorn a perfectly fine product into the most unneeded situations. Think of VisionPro dad recording his child’s birthday, or LLM’s being your therapist?? It feels like coming from a place of insecurity, where in the past technology did affect life’s most important moments (for example the smartphone camera), and they just want to keep trying to recapture that but they can’t force every piece of new technology to fulfill that role.
An ad that showed Gemini proofreading your email, finding grammatical faults and suggesting better words would have been perfectly fine. Or even better an ad that shows how people use Gemini like Google search asking stuff in natural language and receiving correct answers (a lot of LLM’s hallucinate really less now), and even if Olympics isn’t the right platform, an ad just displaying the coding capabilities of these bots would be perfect. Instead we get inundated with this nonsense, next we will get an ad that shows a child write a heartfelt letter to her terminally ill bed ridden mother using Gemini, sigh.
Re: Gemini Ad Backlash
#6Yeah, ugh, what were they thinking? The whole point of a fan letter is the personal connection, telling that person you admire who you are and why they inspire you.
Re: Gemini Ad Backlash
#7> It looks like you're using an ad blocker.
CBS News is your go-to destination for breaking news and exclusive reporting across the globe. Your browser or blocker is impacting your experience. Click below to access the full site.
I don't block ads. I block being stalked throughout my passage online by 3rd parties that are not even of your choosing. I'll stop blocking your ads when they are no longer stalky.
In the meantime cbsnews.com itself has been added to my DNS blocklist, just in case.
Grumble grumble moan moan.
Re: Gemini Ad Backlash
#8[deleted]
Re: Gemini Ad Backlash
#9Yeah, ugh, what were they thinking? The whole point of a fan letter is the personal connection, telling that person you admire who you are and why they inspire you.
If you compare this with the recent Apple add of crushing everything into a thin tablet, I can at least see the reasoning and the benefit. They should have seen it from other perspectives and changed it, but there is something smart there. This is just not smart from any perspective, and it's hard to imagine how people at Google didn't understand this.
Re: Gemini Ad Backlash
#10I can't recall a technological advancement that capital so badly wanted at labor's expense in my lifetime. There is a desperation to come up with consumer products powered by AI to get them on board, similar to how they got on board with cheap goods via offshore manufacturing, or telecommunication tools that facilitate "calling grandma" that lead to outsourcing. There really seems to be almost zero consumer products…
I think it’s because of how expensive AI is to develop, how easy it is to sell the idea of a thinking machine (and the implications of having the first real AGI) to investors, and how thirsty tech is for another platform for 20 years of rampant growth now that it seems social media is starting to dry up.