Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
github.com
Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
1–10 of 180 posts
Re: Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
#2Re: Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
#3I know it won't have the atomicity of a CoW fs, but I'd be fine with that, as the important files on my systems aren't often modified, especially during a backup - I'd configure it to disable the systemd timers while the backup process is running.
Re: Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
#4Similarly, it doesn't do anything in regards to user files.
Re: Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
#5Re: Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
#6Can timeshift work with ext4 filesystems? I know it won't have the atomicity of a CoW fs, but I'd be fine with that, as the important files on my systems aren't often modified, especially during a backup - I'd configure it to disable the systemd timers while the backup process is running.
Re: Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
#7Re: Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
#8This reminds me of the default behavior of NixOS. Whenever you make a change in the configuration for NixOS and rebuild it, it takes a snapshot of the system configurations and lets you restore after a reboot if you screw something up. Similarly, it doesn't do anything in regards to user files.
Re: Timeshift: System Restore Tool for Linux
#9This makes no sense! System Restore is a useless wart that just wastes time making "restore points" at every app/driver install and can rarely (if ever) produce a working system when used to "restore" anything. It does not back up user data at all. Time Machine is a whole-system backup solution that seems to work quite well and does back up user data.
To me the quoted statement might as well read "a tool similar to knitting needles (in hobby shops) and dremels (in machine shops)"
Reading their description further, it seems like they are implementing something similar to TimeMachine (within the confines of what linux makes possible), and not at all like "System Restore". This seems sane as this implements something that is actually useful. They, sadly, seem to gloss over what the consequences are of using non-btrfs FS with this tool, only mentioning that btrfs is needed for byte-exact snapshots. They do not mention what sort of byte-inexactness ext4 users should expect...