So you think you know box shadows?

rikafurude21 wrote: post #4

Hard_Space wrote: post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since this is a Reddit-style comment, have to say that username checks out.

Your reply is quite literally a reddit meme, one of the more cringy ones too. Whats your point?

Was replying in the spirit of OP.

Re: So you think you know box shadows?

#6

Post by lpapez » Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 3:01 PM UTC

rikafurude21 wrote: post #2

[flagged]

[dead]

Re: So you think you know box shadows?

#7

Post by [deleted] » Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 3:02 PM UTC

rikafurude21 wrote: post #2

[flagged]

[deleted]

Re: So you think you know box shadows?

#8

Post by paulirish » Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 3:03 PM UTC

Seriously fun exploration.

> Layering. That is an important word.

Layering is also the key to the (silly but also sometimes good-looking) effects from my text shadow project from 14yrs ago: https://paulirish.github.io/mothereffingtextshadow/

Re: So you think you know box shadows?

#9

Post by TeMPOraL » Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 3:12 PM UTC

rikafurude21 wrote: post #2

[flagged]

Come on. It's thanks to articles like these I can finally have LLM write all those bullshit CSS hacks for me, and I even get to keep rejecting its commits until it gets it right!

(Though honestly, right now, getting GPT-4o to do responsive layout is an exercise in frustration equivalent to doing it myself.)

Re: So you think you know box shadows?

#10

Post by cchance » Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 3:27 PM UTC

He said it might melt your processor... but on a macbook m3 in arc runs great, like every one of those was amazing.