Never Update Anything
blog.kronis.dev
Never Update Anything
1–10 of 121 posts
Re: Never Update Anything
#2Author proceeds to add to two updates to the article, epic troll.
Re: Never Update Anything
#3Re: Never Update Anything
#4Re: Never Update Anything
#5you can definitely do that with python today: assemble a large group of packages that conver a large fraction of what people need to do, and maintain that as the 1 or 2 big packages. nobody's stopping you.
Re: Never Update Anything
#6"Never Update Anything" Author proceeds to add to two updates to the article, epic troll.
The current BSOD epidemic demonstrated the folly of mass concurrent versioning.
*nix admins are used to playing upgrade Chicken with their uptime scores. lol =)
Re: Never Update Anything
#7Re: Never Update Anything
#8This is what applications used to be like, before the web and internet hit and regular or even push updating became easy.
It was simply so difficult and expensive to provide updates once the software was in the customer's hands that it was done intentionally and infrequently. For the most part, you bought software, installed it, and used it. That was it. It never changed, unless you bought it again in a newer version
Re: Never Update Anything
#9Re: Never Update Anything
#10I don't think the article itself holds up that well, it's just that updates are often a massive pain, one that you have to deal with somehow regardless. Realistically, LTS versions of OS distros and technologies that don't change often will lessen the pain, but not eliminate it entirely.
And even then, you'll still need to deal with breaking changes when you will be forced to upgrade across major releases (e.g. JDK 8 to something newer after EOL) or migrate once a technology dies altogether (e.g. AngularJS).
It's not like people will backport fixes for anything indefinitely either.