Untitled topic
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: undefined
#2Re: undefined
#3Humans in older cultures made many species extinct. Also the author seems to have some kind of issue with religious people despite the most happy societies being deeply religious, usually Christian and sometimes Buddhist, these cultures are much more family oriented, and less individualist.
Re: undefined
#4Humans in older cultures made many species extinct. Also the author seems to have some kind of issue with religious people despite the most happy societies being deeply religious, usually Christian and sometimes Buddhist, these cultures are much more family oriented, and less individualist.
How are tou measuring happiness? Studies say that Finland and other secular scandinavian countries are among the happiest. Deeply religious countries are usually not.
Re: undefined
#5Humans in older cultures made many species extinct. Also the author seems to have some kind of issue with religious people despite the most happy societies being deeply religious, usually Christian and sometimes Buddhist, these cultures are much more family oriented, and less individualist.
How are tou measuring happiness? Studies say that Finland and other secular scandinavian countries are among the happiest. Deeply religious countries are usually not.
Re: undefined
#6If the answer to the question posed in the headline was "yes" they would have stated it as such.
Instead it seems that "don't change things despite the world changing, decreased availability of resources, and increased completion for said scarce resources" is the main thrust of the post?
Maybe I misread but I tried