X.org Testing Ground Toolkit: Making It Less Difficult to Compile the X Server
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: X.org Testing Ground Toolkit: Making It Less Difficult to Compile the X Server
#2Calling Enrico Weigelt an "Xorg developer" is a bit much. He's someone who showed up, started submitting a bunch of very PRs to clean up the code, and then other people had to revert them when they broke the build. None of the work he's doing is the kind of really important code maintenance that Xorg would need.
This is just something he posted to a mailing list that nobody replied to. Xorg already has functional CI and is relatively easy to compile already.
Re: X.org Testing Ground Toolkit: Making It Less Difficult to Compile the X Server
#3Calling Enrico Weigelt an "Xorg developer" is a bit much. He's someone who showed up, started submitting a bunch of very PRs to clean up the code, and then other people had to revert them when they broke the build. None of the work he's doing is the kind of really important code maintenance that Xorg would need. This is just something he posted to a mailing list that nobody replied to. Xorg already has functional CI…
> kind of really important code maintenance that Xorg would need
What maintenance is actually needed for Xorg?
Re: X.org Testing Ground Toolkit: Making It Less Difficult to Compile the X Server
#4Calling Enrico Weigelt an "Xorg developer" is a bit much. He's someone who showed up, started submitting a bunch of very PRs to clean up the code, and then other people had to revert them when they broke the build. None of the work he's doing is the kind of really important code maintenance that Xorg would need. This is just something he posted to a mailing list that nobody replied to. Xorg already has functional CI…
> kind of really important code maintenance that Xorg would need What maintenance is actually needed for Xorg?
Replacement by Wayland, for real