Live data from Hacker News

AMD's MI300X Outperforms Nvidia's H100 for LLM Inference

blog.tensorwave.com

1–10 of 273 posts

Re: AMD's MI300X Outperforms Nvidia's H100 for LLM Inference

#5
> Hardware: TensorWave node equipped with 8 MI300X accelerators, 2 AMD EPYC CPU Processors (192 cores), and 2.3 TB of DDR5 RAM.

> MI300X Accelerator: 192GB VRAM, 5.3 TB/s, ~1300 TFLOPS for FP16

> Hardware: Baremetal node with 8 H100 SXM5 accelerators with NVLink, 160 CPU cores, and 1.2 TB of DDR5 RAM.

> H100 SXM5 Accelerator: 80GB VRAM, 3.35 TB/s, ~986 TFLOPS for FP16

I really wonder about the pricing. In theory the MI300X is supposed to be cheaper, but whether is that is really the case in practice remains to be seen.

Re: AMD's MI300X Outperforms Nvidia's H100 for LLM Inference

#7
I'm wondering if the tensor parallel settings have any impact on the performance. My naive guess is yes but not sure.

According to the article: """ AMD Configuration: Tensor parallelism set to 1 (tp=1), since we can fit the entire model Mixtral 8x7B in a single MI300X’s 192GB of VRAM.

NVIDIA Configuration: Tensor parallelism set to 2 (tp=2), which is required to fit Mixtral 8x7B in two H100’s 80GB VRAM. """

Re: AMD's MI300X Outperforms Nvidia's H100 for LLM Inference

#9
post #3

Is this an ad for a new, closed-source, GPGPU backend?

Pretty much and the test suit is optimized to get the results they wanted.

Pretty sure a useful benchmark for this kind of thing would calculate performance per watt (or per watt and dollar).

That info is conspicuously absent from the article.

Post reply on HN