Lowering resource usage with foot and systemd
1–10 of 33 posts
Re: Lowering resource usage with foot and systemd
#2—
1: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foot#Server_mode_configuration
Re: Lowering resource usage with foot and systemd
#3I never heard about it but foot is a terminal emulator with some server mode [1]. — 1: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foot#Server_mode_configuration
Re: Lowering resource usage with foot and systemd
#4I never heard about it but foot is a terminal emulator with some server mode [1]. — 1: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foot#Server_mode_configuration
Re: Lowering resource usage with foot and systemd
#5> Figure 1: Snapshot of memory consumption (from btop), clients take around 10x less memory
By all means use a server/clients approach if it reduces per-process memory, but it's probably not as bad as it looks, because AFAIK the actual executable only gets loaded once and then reused. So each process has its own data in RAM, but the executable/binary only gets loaded the once.
Also, if this is a problem maybe revisit your choice of terminal? It's annoyingly hard to get a total (or more likely I just don't know how to get it), but every number I can seem to find says alacritty is only using total on my box, so your 27M max on foot looks... weird. Like, I can run a full standalone terminal in the size of your client; I appreciate that it might have features that make it worthwhile, but consider the tradeoffs?
Re: Lowering resource usage with foot and systemd
#6I ended up dropping it for the same reason I dropped emacs server. There are rare edge cases which causes the server to hang and thus taking down not just one instance of your work, but all of it. Losing the resilience of multiple processes is not worth the RAM it saves, not on modern hardware.
Re: Lowering resource usage with foot and systemd
#7> Right of the bat, it is rather evident that this configuration will spawn two instances of foot, one for each scratchpad. > Figure 1: Snapshot of memory consumption (from btop), clients take around 10x less memory By all means use a server/clients approach if it reduces per-process memory, but it's probably not as bad as it looks, because AFAIK the actual executable only gets loaded once and then reused. So each pr…
Though of course, the memory usage on modern machines is really not a major issue, but the configuration update, along with the tmux session death was annoying..
EDIT: Some timing metrics..
foot -s &
hyperfine --warmup 8 'alacritty -e true' 'foot -e true' 'footclient -e true'
Benchmark 1: alacritty -e true
Time (mean ± σ): 99.0 ms ± 14.2 ms [User: 58.5 ms, System: 33.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 82.7 ms … 148.3 ms 32 runs
Benchmark 2: foot -e true
Time (mean ± σ): 37.2 ms ± 2.3 ms [User: 40.3 ms, System: 9.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 33.8 ms … 43.7 ms 83 runs
Benchmark 3: footclient -e true
Time (mean ± σ): 22.8 ms ± 4.3 ms [User: 0.9 ms, System: 0.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 18.2 ms … 63.6 ms 133 runs
Summary
footclient -e true ran
1.63 ± 0.32 times faster than foot -e true
4.35 ± 1.03 times faster than alacritty -e trueRe: Lowering resource usage with foot and systemd
#8Really enjoyed foot! Runs along the same lines of emacs server and emacsclient. I ended up dropping it for the same reason I dropped emacs server. There are rare edge cases which causes the server to hang and thus taking down not just one instance of your work, but all of it. Losing the resilience of multiple processes is not worth the RAM it saves, not on modern hardware.
Re: Lowering resource usage with foot and systemd
#9I do the same thing with URxvt as a systemd daemon, Tmux as a transient service with systemd-run from .bashrc, and a script in i3wm to run URxvtd client or hide/get the window.
The way I use to run Tmux from a transient service locally and in ssh with the same .bashrc is nice I think. Tmux will survive the terminal and even if I close my session and come back to it:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# ~/.bashrc: sourced by bash(1) for non-login shells.
# If not running interactively, don't do anything
case $- in
*i*) ;;
*) return ;;
esac
chmod 700 ~/.bashrc.d
chmod 600 ~/.bashrc ~/.bashrc.d/*
# check if we are already in a Tmux session and not in ssh then open/attach the default one
if [[ ! "${TERM}" == "tmux"* ]] && [[ -z "${TMUX}" ]] && [[ -z "${SSH_CONNECTION}" ]] && command -v tmux 1> /dev/null; then
# attach or start the local default Tmux session
if systemctl --quiet $([[ $(id -u) != 0 ]]; echo "--user") is-active tmux-local-$(id -un).scope; then
tmux -L local-$(id -un) attach-session -t local-$(id -un) ; exit
fi
systemd-run -q --unit tmux-local-$(id -un) --scope $([[ $(id -u) != 0 ]] && echo "--user") tmux -L local-$(id -un) new-session -s local-$(id -un) ; exit
elif [[ -z "${TMUX}" ]] && [[ -n "${SSH_CONNECTION}" ]] && command -v tmux 1> /dev/null; then
# attach or start the ssh default Tmux session
if systemctl --quiet $([[ $(id -u) != 0 ]]; echo "--user") is-active tmux-ssh-$(id -un).scope; then
tmux -L ssh-$(id -un) attach-session -t ssh-$(id -un) ; exit
fi
systemd-run -q --unit tmux-ssh-$(id -un) --scope $([[ $(id -u) != 0 ]] && echo "--user") tmux -L ssh-$(id -un) new-session -s ssh-$(id -un) && exit || echo 'Tmux Systemd unit failed/exited'
fi
# if Tmux is not installed or if we are inside a Tmux session continue the sourcing
for file in ~/.bashrc.d/*.bashrc;
do
source "${file}"
done