Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
freebsdfoundation.org
Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
1–10 of 27 posts
Re: Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
#2Re: Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
#3It doesn't say in this press release but are WYSE/Dell contributing back to FreeBSD in any way?
Re: Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
#4Re: Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
#5It doesn't say in this press release but are WYSE/Dell contributing back to FreeBSD in any way?
$ git log | grep -i '@dell.com' | wc -l
86Re: Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
#6It doesn't say in this press release but are WYSE/Dell contributing back to FreeBSD in any way?
"FreeBSD’s BSD license offers customization flexibility without the obligation to disclose proprietary enhancements."
But I suppose maybe some of their less sensitive changes, if upstreamed, relieves them of having to own them.
Re: Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
#7It doesn't say in this press release but are WYSE/Dell contributing back to FreeBSD in any way?
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OneFS_distributed_file_system
You can search for "Sponsored by:" in commits for who did work:
Re: Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
#8Nice to see a BSD getting decent press.
Re: Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
#9It doesn't say in this press release but are WYSE/Dell contributing back to FreeBSD in any way?
They are donors to the FreeBSD Foundation in addition to committing patches: $ git log | grep -i '@dell.com' | wc -l 86
A better search may be 'Sponsored by:.*[Dell|EMC|Isilon]' or some such.
Some Dell folks may be committers and be pushing things with their @freebsd.org address.
Re: Why Dell's ThinOS Runs on FreeBSD
#10> License Advantages: FreeBSD’s BSD license offers customization flexibility without the obligation to disclose proprietary enhancements. This aspect is crucial for Dell, allowing the company to tailor the OS to its specific security and performance needs while maintaining proprietary control over its software.
Ok... I see where this is going...
> Engineering Efficiency: Dell’s engineering team benefits from FreeBSD’s stable kernel source code. It simplifies integrating and maintaining customized code, reducing the effort and resources required to keep ThinOS up to date.
Nice one.
> Security Enhancements: The stability of the FreeBSD kernel, coupled with the permissive BSD license, which allows vendors to keep proprietary modifications under wraps, significantly bolsters ThinOS’s security posture and creates a robust platform less susceptible to attacks than a CopyLeft-based system with GPL components.
Are they really defending security through obscurity (closed-source blobs) and at the same time attacking GPL in the same paragraph?