Seriously? Ads?
blog.dinkevich.com
Seriously? Ads?
1–10 of 229 posts
Re: Seriously? Ads?
#2Re: Seriously? Ads?
#3And then Facebook would know everything I buy.
Re: Seriously? Ads?
#4Facebook has scared off a lot of the "moms" out there by their bad bad bad privacy history. Do you really want to pay for things using their service?
Re: Seriously? Ads?
#5Which keeps them from using that hypothetical service, because they don't want to risk losing the account over a transaction that went wrong.
Or maybe not. Who knows?
Re: Seriously? Ads?
#6Too late, I think. Facebook has scared off a lot of the "moms" out there by their bad bad bad privacy history. Do you really want to pay for things using their service?
Re: Seriously? Ads?
#7It would definitely be the next step in user lock-in, but you'd start competing with banks and everyone else who offers a way to pay.
Now, I wouldn't complain if they bought some "bypass the credit card companies" service like Dwolla...
Re: Seriously? Ads?
#8With credit cards we have a number of "hidden alternatives". We've got multiple processors, multiple card companies, etc. It's a number of layers there. With Facebook and Paypal... you're not able to pay when they say you're not able to pay (or be paid). They're not even controlled banks, so there's little you can do about some issues.
Think about all the problems when Google cut someone off and didn't provide any way of contacting them. Do you have a good way to contact Paypal, or Facebook now? (besides forms that result in canned responses) What are the incentives for changing it?
Re: Seriously? Ads?
#9Too late, I think. Facebook has scared off a lot of the "moms" out there by their bad bad bad privacy history. Do you really want to pay for things using their service?