Live data from Hacker News

Going Public Means Never Admitting You’re Wrong

jordanstaniscia.com

1–10 of 12 posts

Re: Going Public Means Never Admitting You’re Wrong

#4
The author makes the point that companies don't admit mistakes because they fear the stock would plummet. I don't think that is entirely accurate, or if it is, the stock plummet is incidental to the actual risk that comes from admitting mistakes: investor lawsuits.

And regarding start-ups and their propensity for owning up and apologizing, I've never really seen much in the way of sincerity from the likes of Path or those in similar flare ups. It's just that an apology is the quickest and cheapest form of damage control when the fickle masses and page view hungry tech bloggers are crucifying you on twitter.

Re: Going Public Means Never Admitting You’re Wrong

#5
Isn't this conflating Morgan Stanley (and Nasdaq) with Facebook? One could also blame the media for generating an inordinate amount of hype, and then turning around in a day to call the IPO a failure. But, a failure to whom? Most of what I've read here recently suggests that a successful IPO for a company means leaving as little money on the table as possible, which means a stock price that stays relatively flat (or even goes down a tiny bit). Because everyone expected a pop, the IPO is considered a flop. One could look at the situation from another angle and say that Facebook did what was best for themselves, not the share price – which could be seen as a positive signal for people who don't think that companies should be ruled by the short-term ups and downs of the market. I mean, when the valuation of a company is based on an extremely long outlook and yet-to-be-determined strategies and pivots, what do people expect?

Re: Going Public Means Never Admitting You’re Wrong

#6
Usually I dismiss posts like this. And I have to admit -- I browsed the frontpage several times without clicking on it.

But I think this is very cogent, and one I had totally forgotten about in the whole FB media circus. But this is a rare opportunity for FB to reject precisely the parts of public company SOP that doom them to lack of understanding with their customers, etc.

FB has a hacker / break things culture. Public companies can't admit these things to the public.

Public companies often stagnate by not being able to relate to customers via the full feedback loop that admitting mistakes includes. Some companies get lucky because they insist on getting in touch with what the customer wants in other ways (e.g., through data at Google or through Lean Startup and two-pizza-size teams at other companies, etc.)

But it is an opportunity for FB to buck the norm and continue to take open risks and admit when they make mistakes. It is an opportunity to transform the culture of public companies.

Re: Going Public Means Never Admitting You’re Wrong

#9
post #6

Usually I dismiss posts like this. And I have to admit -- I browsed the frontpage several times without clicking on it. But I think this is very cogent, and one I had totally forgotten about in the whole FB media circus. But this is a rare opportunity for FB to reject precisely the parts of public company SOP that doom them to lack of understanding with their customers, etc. FB has a hacker / break things culture. Pu…

>"Public companies can't admit these things to the public."

The OP's article is based off of a faulty premise, disproven with a simple Google search. Yes. They can and do admit they were wrong, and apologize publicly. It's ridiculous to suggest otherwise:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02...

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2012-05/05/c_1315692...

http://blog.netflix.com/2010/09/apologies.html

http://blog.games.com/2011/08/03/nintendo-president-apology-...

http://www.cellular-news.com/story/51329.php

etc, etc...

Post reply on HN