HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
#2Re: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
#3Re: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
#4> This specification revises and extends the markup model established by HTML to express ruby.
The posted link is a short announcement. Here are the actual specs:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/WD-html-ruby-extensions-20240507/
Re: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
#5Re: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
#6Re: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
#7For those who were as confused as I was from the title - this has nothing to do with the Ruby language
Re: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
#8Even when ruby markup is popular with south-east asian scripts I mostly want to use it for interlinear text or textspan-level inline annotations for a software to learn languages.
I remember with the ruby specified in XHTML standard there were ergonomic issues when ruby is written, i.e. it's nice for interlinear text markup to not have to close HTML tags. Also there were issues where people did not understand what the differences between mono ruby, group ruby and jukugo ruby is (correct me if I remember it wrong).
Ruby seems to be not implemented well in browsers, some ruby-related tags were deprecated, the specification posted is part of the restoration of these tags [1]. But last time I checked there was interest of all major browser manufactors to implement ruby standard properly.
Re: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
#9Well this is tremendously confusing. I 100% thought this was going to be 'ERB' related...
*Update:* Oh and it's interesting, "rubi" was used but the W3C recommendation from 2001 made "ruby" more common as spelling.
Re: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions Working Draft Published
#10
in a browser, which would be v interesting