Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
twitter.com
Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
#2This reads like a corporate phishing email. Probably came from jeff.bezos@therealamazon.com
Re: Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
#3This reads like a corporate phishing email. Probably came from jeff.bezos@therealamazon.com
If it was a phishing email it would have a signal username, not just "use signal"
Re: Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
#4Execs can only use E2EE for personal purposes, not business.
Re: Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
#5Execs can only use E2EE for personal purposes, not business.
Is this a law or something?
Re: Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
#6Execs can only use E2EE for personal purposes, not business.
Is this a law or something?
Well, considering an outbreak of destroyed evidence seems to be happening in the courts, with some accountability hopefully it will be an unwritten law. But of course Congress could also get involved.
Re: Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this a law or something?
Well, considering an outbreak of destroyed evidence seems to be happening in the courts, with some accountability hopefully it will be an unwritten law. But of course Congress could also get involved.
Should we outlaw executives having business-related phone calls or face-to-face conversations, too?
Re: Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
#8Re: Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this a law or something?
Well, considering an outbreak of destroyed evidence seems to be happening in the courts, with some accountability hopefully it will be an unwritten law. But of course Congress could also get involved.
to me this is like saying a casual conversation in the park is destruction of evidence just because you didn't record it
Re: Jeff Bezos emails Amazon exec
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, considering an outbreak of destroyed evidence seems to be happening in the courts, with some accountability hopefully it will be an unwritten law. But of course Congress could also get involved.
Should we outlaw executives having business-related phone calls or face-to-face conversations, too?
And if those calls weren't recorded, is that going to be destruction of evidence too? Where is the line drawn and who gets to say where?