Live data from Hacker News

Are recruiters better than a coin flip at judging resumes? Here's the data

interviewing.io

1–10 of 30 posts

Re: Are recruiters better than a coin flip at judging resumes? Here's the data

#2
[I start a quick skim of the article...and run into a wall of all-italics text, with plenty of hype-happy words & phrases.]

[I stop caring. The authors seem so wired on hype, caffeine, or something that I wouldn't trust their assertion that 14^2 = 196.]

Re: Are recruiters better than a coin flip at judging resumes? Here's the data

#6
Are there any other business constructs that are similarly as universally bad as recruitment? Like which stakeholder actually thinks they're any good? Maybe certain kinds of outsourcing would be comparable, where someone sees a cost savings but otherwise doesn't care at all about the outcome?

Re: Are recruiters better than a coin flip at judging resumes? Here's the data

#9
The software engineering world is fortunate to have the concept of open source, which allows filtering of candidates based on previous published work. Since today we have many open source active candidates, it makes selection much easier compared to unknown candidates. My advice to job seekers - you’re reducing your employment chances if you dont have example projects published.
Post reply on HN