Much Ado About "Nothing"
xeiaso.net
Much Ado About "Nothing"
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Much Ado About "Nothing"
#2Anyone want to break down what is at issue for the spectators?
Re: Much Ado About "Nothing"
#3I suppose I'm not the intended audience since I don't have prerequisite knowledge of whatever the governance issue at hand is, but I read this and the linked statements and to me it all falls in the category of 'vagueposting' Anyone want to break down what is at issue for the spectators?
Re: Much Ado About "Nothing"
#4Re: Much Ado About "Nothing"
#5I suppose I'm not the intended audience since I don't have prerequisite knowledge of whatever the governance issue at hand is, but I read this and the linked statements and to me it all falls in the category of 'vagueposting' Anyone want to break down what is at issue for the spectators?
It sounds like it's related to https://save-nix-together.org/ (that being the most recent thing)?
Well that certainly paints a picture, thanks.
Re: Much Ado About "Nothing"
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
It sounds like it's related to https://save-nix-together.org/ (that being the most recent thing)?
> The Foundation board has unrepresentative composition relative to the community because, due to our count, all current members are cisgender, white-passing, men, one of whom has done military service, and one other (Eelco) likely relies on undisclosed military-tech work. Well that certainly paints a picture, thanks.
Re: Much Ado About "Nothing"
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The Foundation board has unrepresentative composition relative to the community because, due to our count, all current members are cisgender, white-passing, men, one of whom has done military service, and one other (Eelco) likely relies on undisclosed military-tech work. Well that certainly paints a picture, thanks.
So you will stop reading the rest of the letter because you found something you didn't like?