TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
bellard.org
TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
1–10 of 101 posts
Re: TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
#2Re: TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
#3Re: TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
#4Re: TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
#5Are there standard-ish codec comparison processes that we can run to see how much perceived fidelity is lost in compression here?
Re: TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
#6echo -ne "\x90\x90" | dd if=/dev/stdin of=tsac bs=1 seek=23914 conv=notrunc
you can corrupt the compressed files with very interesting results: https://meow.social/@mimir/112238998609778334
the fast mode (you don't have to patch the binary for this one, it seems to not do the CRC check?) and the normal (non-fast) mode sound different, but both quite interesting
Re: TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
#7I wonder how it compares to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec2 and related codecs, which go even lower for bitrate.
Re: TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
#8if you patch out the CRC check in the binary with echo -ne "\x90\x90" | dd if=/dev/stdin of=tsac bs=1 seek=23914 conv=notrunc you can corrupt the compressed files with very interesting results: https://meow.social/@mimir/112238998609778334 the fast mode (you don't have to patch the binary for this one, it seems to not do the CRC check?) and the normal (non-fast) mode sound different, but both quite interesting
Re: TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
#9Re: TSAC: Low Bitrate Audio Compression
#10Clicked the download link wanting to take a look at the source... and was a bit perplexed before quickly canceling it. 237MB, compressed , for an audio codec!? At that point one can't help but think that the samples are already in the decoder itself. I wonder how it compares to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec2 and related codecs, which go even lower for bitrate.