The Rise of the Remote Husband
economist.com
The Rise of the Remote Husband
1–10 of 54 posts
Re: The Rise of the Remote Husband
#2Both husbands were doing essentially non-remote work at home (academia and a home-office business). And had multiple children to look after, at home, as part of the deal.
Re: The Rise of the Remote Husband
#3Re: The Rise of the Remote Husband
#4Re: The Rise of the Remote Husband
#5Can't read behind pay wall. Does the article actually provide data or is it just based on the 5 "examples" provided in the beginning?
Re: The Rise of the Remote Husband
#6Can't read behind pay wall. Does the article actually provide data or is it just based on the 5 "examples" provided in the beginning?
Re: The Rise of the Remote Husband
#7Can't read behind pay wall. Does the article actually provide data or is it just based on the 5 "examples" provided in the beginning?
Not much data. Just:
> Different occupations have also had to take different approaches to remote working...About half of people working in computer or mathematical jobs work remotely full-time. The upshot is that, in aggregate, it is easier for men to work from wherever they please. A survey carried out by McKinsey, a consultancy, found that 38% of working men had the option to work remotely full-time, compared with 30% of women. Roughly half of women report being unable to work remotely at all, compared with 39% of men.
Re: The Rise of the Remote Husband
#8Re: The Rise of the Remote Husband
#9Re: The Rise of the Remote Husband
#10In once instance, one partner is a clinician and absolutely has to be on site 5 days a week, not counting on-call. The other works 100% remote but the company is global, so depending on the week they may be on Europe time or Australia time.
This is definitely a work arrangement I couldn't have imagined being common 10 years ago. This shift will likely be one of the defining economic changes between the 10's and the 20's.