Live data from Hacker News

Texas hailstorm damages solar panels at 350-MW farm

renewableenergyworld.com

1–10 of 21 posts

Re: Texas hailstorm damages solar panels at 350-MW farm

#4
Largely a non-story, and anti-solar propaganda. It is a consideration when designing solar panels and fields, but a minor one. Simply an insurance question: insure all the panels, if a storm happens, replace the destroyed panels. With the massively falling cost of solar panels, the cost to replace will soon be trivial, making this even less of a concern.

Re: Texas hailstorm damages solar panels at 350-MW farm

#6
post #4

Largely a non-story, and anti-solar propaganda. It is a consideration when designing solar panels and fields, but a minor one. Simply an insurance question: insure all the panels, if a storm happens, replace the destroyed panels. With the massively falling cost of solar panels, the cost to replace will soon be trivial, making this even less of a concern.

If I have to choose between an earthquake crippling a nuclear power plant, and hail storms damaging solar panels, I know which disaster I’d prefer.

Re: Texas hailstorm damages solar panels at 350-MW farm

#7

I thought those solar panels are designed to survive hail stone storms.

You never design things to be indestructible. You design for a 100 year storm or something like that, or a 500 year earthquake when designing buildings. Eventually, something will happen that destroys it, but that's an acceptable risk to take. Cars aren't designed to withstand all crashes, just a certain fraction.

Re: Texas hailstorm damages solar panels at 350-MW farm

#8

I thought those solar panels are designed to survive hail stone storms.

> Hail is becoming a prominent issue for the PV industry as more sites are being built in the central U.S. — a hail-prone region — and modules are moving towards larger formats with thinner glass.

Re: Texas hailstorm damages solar panels at 350-MW farm

#10
post #4

Largely a non-story, and anti-solar propaganda. It is a consideration when designing solar panels and fields, but a minor one. Simply an insurance question: insure all the panels, if a storm happens, replace the destroyed panels. With the massively falling cost of solar panels, the cost to replace will soon be trivial, making this even less of a concern.

I mean the linked tweet does seem to be from some anti-renewables idiot.
Post reply on HN