US standards body says ByteDance researcher wrongly added to AI safety groupchat
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: US standards body says ByteDance researcher wrongly added to AI safety groupchat
#2To be sure, there was a former Apple employee and a former Google employee held liable for data exfiltration. But ByteDance is the risk. Okay.
Edit: To all the downvoters, check facts vs. hysteria. You know, cuz science and facts and data and evidence and truth values.
Re: US standards body says ByteDance researcher wrongly added to AI safety groupchat
#3It's not clear who added the bytedance researcher to slack as a volunteer.
I would more question what they were doing in violation of the consortium rules inviting the employee, than that employee joining.
Re: US standards body says ByteDance researcher wrongly added to AI safety groupchat
#4[deleted]
Re: US standards body says ByteDance researcher wrongly added to AI safety groupchat
#5To be sure, there was a former Apple employee and a former Google employee held liable for data exfiltration. But ByteDance is the risk. Okay. Edit: To all the downvoters, check facts vs. hysteria. You know, cuz science and facts and data and evidence and truth values.
>check facts vs. hysteria
Would love to. Have a citation to guide in that process?
Re: US standards body says ByteDance researcher wrongly added to AI safety groupchat
#6To be sure, there was a former Apple employee and a former Google employee held liable for data exfiltration. But ByteDance is the risk. Okay. Edit: To all the downvoters, check facts vs. hysteria. You know, cuz science and facts and data and evidence and truth values.
>check facts vs. hysteria Would love to. Have a citation to guide in that process?
Of course. Where would you like to start? Mis/Disinfo campaigns, cognitive biases, review of scientific method?