Live data from Hacker News

Blue Origin has emerged as the likely buyer for United Launch Alliance

arstechnica.com

1–10 of 64 posts

Re: Blue Origin has emerged as the likely buyer for United Launch Alliance

#4
They were always the most likely buyer if you were paying attention.

I admit to being pretty disappointed at the confirmation though. Blue Origin would of done just fine without this merger and 3+ companies competing for US space launches instead of 2 would of been healthier.

Maybe Tony Bruno will launch his own space company? I always thought Boeing and Lockheed were holding him back.

Re: Blue Origin has emerged as the likely buyer for United Launch Alliance

#5
This is overall a good, and needed thing. While the BE-4 engines from Blue Origin are fantastic, they need the level of system maturity that is represented by ULA. Together, I see a real chance to be competitive with SpaceX long term. Yes, they have work to go before they could do reusable launch, but the combined company probably has the best chance to do so.

The more reusable launch providers the better for the industry and for human kind.

Re: Blue Origin has emerged as the likely buyer for United Launch Alliance

#8

They were always the most likely buyer if you were paying attention. I admit to being pretty disappointed at the confirmation though. Blue Origin would of done just fine without this merger and 3+ companies competing for US space launches instead of 2 would of been healthier. Maybe Tony Bruno will launch his own space company? I always thought Boeing and Lockheed were holding him back.

I think ULA did a good enough job of that on its own. They’re like the US Steel of space. A great combination with Blue Origin’s own massive expenditures on recapitulating aerospace sclerosis. :)
Post reply on HN