Live data from Hacker News

Copyright Easter Eggs (2018)

wiki.openstreetmap.org

1–9 of 9 posts

Re: Copyright Easter Eggs (2018)

#3
post #2

Known also as a trap street [0], a name which I believe is more widely used? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street

Are these real? I see this fact (and the trap words in dictionaries one) mentioned extremely often on the internet, and it’s just so cute and clever that it starts to trip my bullshit sense.

Edit: meh, TFA seems to have a fair number of examples, I’m satisfied for now.

Re: Copyright Easter Eggs (2018)

#5
post #3
post #2

Known also as a trap street [0], a name which I believe is more widely used? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street

Are these real? I see this fact (and the trap words in dictionaries one) mentioned extremely often on the internet, and it’s just so cute and clever that it starts to trip my bullshit sense. Edit: meh, TFA seems to have a fair number of examples, I’m satisfied for now.

One of my favorite examples: a fictional town that became real. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agloe,_New_York

Re: Copyright Easter Eggs (2018)

#8
The links to apple copying OSM are pretty interesting in their own right, and demonstrate why OSM's policy is to not include traps in their maps. It's already pretty obvious when they are copied from. TL;DR OSM maps are far more detailed, in places, than the average map so you'll end up copying features you aren't trying to map as something else.

Re: Copyright Easter Eggs (2018)

#9
It’s probably not an Easter egg, but for my neighborhood in Yokohama, Japan, some maps—Mapion, Google, Apple—show a nonexistent street next to my house while others—Yahoo, OSM—don’t:

https://gally.net/temp/20240214maps/index.html

The nonexistent street has been appearing on maps for at least a quarter century.