Live data from Hacker News

Concrete.css

concrete.style

1–10 of 117 posts

Re: Concrete.css

#4
Not sure I would make the "disabled" buttons stand out more brightly than a regular button. In fact I would swap the colors of those buttons, or maybe make the disabled button greyed out.

Re: Concrete.css

#5

water.css[0] and pico.css[1] are some of my favorite classless css libraries. There's a full list of them here: https://github.com/dbohdan/classless-css [0]: https://watercss.kognise.dev/ [1]: https://picocss.com/

I've tried a few of these 'classless CSS'. But I mostly end up with 'water.css'. It gives me the least amount of surprises.

Re: Concrete.css

#6

water.css[0] and pico.css[1] are some of my favorite classless css libraries. There's a full list of them here: https://github.com/dbohdan/classless-css [0]: https://watercss.kognise.dev/ [1]: https://picocss.com/

Water is great.

Simple.css is another one I like. Also super simple to customize.

https://simplecss.org/

Re: Concrete.css

#7
I am a big fan of brutalism but having all those line with same weight and hierarchy in terms of width, proximity and absolute black keeps me out from focusing in textual content.

Re: Concrete.css

#8
post #4

Not sure I would make the "disabled" buttons stand out more brightly than a regular button. In fact I would swap the colors of those buttons, or maybe make the disabled button greyed out.

Agreed. One thing that a lot of people miss when attempting to comply with WCAG contrast guidelines is that disabled controls are specifically exempt.

With good reason, IMO — too much contrast and it’s not clear that an element is disabled.

Re: Concrete.css

#10
This doesn't look right with the dark reader extension in firefox. I would expect a website that's compatible with dark mode to work with dark reader (I.e. I would expect dark reader to not influence the CSS in that case)
Post reply on HN