Live data from Hacker News

"Fake Chinese income" mortgages fuel Toronto real estate bubble: HSBC bank leaks

thebureau.news

1–10 of 417 posts

Re: "Fake Chinese income" mortgages fuel Toronto real estate bubble: HSBC bank leaks

#2
IANAFinancialInvestigator, but skimming through it sounds like:

1. Fraudulent applicants come to the bank with crazy stories to ask for enormous loans/mortgages toward a Toronto house, allegedly to turn hyper-suspicious big piles of cash into a more reputable-looking asset.

2. HSBC goes along with that because they want to suckle on the sweet regular payments of suspicious cash, even though they ought to damn well know that these customers are just a front for an organized crime ring.

3. As a bonus, this locally-concentrated money-laundering/speculative-investment thing screws up the property market for Torontonians. The local multimillionaire babysitter is willing to buy at almost any price because their secret financial goals are very different than yours.

While looking for other articles, I notice it's been ~16 months after the end of HSBC 10-year tangle with US regulators over their business with Mexican and Columbian drug cartels. [0]

[0] https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/us-fed-terminates-e...

Re: "Fake Chinese income" mortgages fuel Toronto real estate bubble: HSBC bank leaks

#7

HSBC DOING SHADY SHIT? Business as usual, remember when they took in all that drug cartel money? They shouldn't exist.

HSBC was created to deal with opium money following the opium wars because other banks would not.

Re: "Fake Chinese income" mortgages fuel Toronto real estate bubble: HSBC bank leaks

#8
> making him a minority among mostly Chinese-Canadian co-workers at the Aurora branch.

Not trying to point fingers on whether the branch workers were in on the whole thing, but maybe it was easier to perpetuate the fraud because of cultural familiarity?

Re: "Fake Chinese income" mortgages fuel Toronto real estate bubble: HSBC bank leaks

#9
post #3

It's quite bizarre any jurisdiction would allow someone to buy housing there when they can't legally live in it.

Why? Should we restrict other investments with similar logic? For example should non-residents not be allowed to purchase vacation properties and lease them?

The impulse to enlist the government to regulate private property and investments is not productive and results in endless encroachment of individual liberties and rights to governments.

Post reply on HN