Does Rust have an advantage if memory-safety is not an advantage?
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Does Rust have an advantage if memory-safety is not an advantage?
#2> the Rust CPU time advantage is -75%.
This is in error.
The difference is -75% but the advantage is 75%.
Re: Does Rust have an advantage if memory-safety is not an advantage?
#3Not seeing anything about if the C# code was compiled to native code using AOT.
Re: Does Rust have an advantage if memory-safety is not an advantage?
#4Isn't replacement of complex patterns better served by generated regexes (and both .NET's built-in and Rust's most popular regex crate are very fast)?
(questioning whether this particular case is illustrative for the point the article makes)