Analyst, measure thyself
blog.noblemail.ca
Analyst, measure thyself
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Analyst, measure thyself
#2Re: Analyst, measure thyself
#3Why not use logistic regression to estimate likelihood of signup rather than clustering the population into 5 groups? I'd imagine the resulting predictive model would not only have more direct methods for measuring prediction error, but also provide more business insight.
In general your work may be complicated/sophisticated. But your results need to be simple.
Re: Analyst, measure thyself
#4Why not use logistic regression to estimate likelihood of signup rather than clustering the population into 5 groups? I'd imagine the resulting predictive model would not only have more direct methods for measuring prediction error, but also provide more business insight.
But for human consumption (and I believe this article is an example of that), it can help. It's basically an ocular Hosmer-Lemeshow; not a rigorous or even consistent approach to model performance evaluation, but often interesting to those consuming the model's output. For example, we do it here to give students a sense of what their chances have meant historically: https://www.parchment.com/c/college/college-1404-University-...
[1] See the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, now uncommonly used.
Re: Analyst, measure thyself
#5Why not use logistic regression to estimate likelihood of signup rather than clustering the population into 5 groups? I'd imagine the resulting predictive model would not only have more direct methods for measuring prediction error, but also provide more business insight.
All that said, I doubt it makes a difference in this case.