Live data from Hacker News

Artists can poison their pics with deadly Nightshade to deter AI scrapers

theregister.com

1–10 of 27 posts

Re: Artists can poison their pics with deadly Nightshade to deter AI scrapers

#5
Any AI art/video/photography/music/text/etc generator company whose generates revenue needs to add watermarks to let the public know its AI generated(it's embedded with metadata specific to each company). This should be forced via legislation in all countries.

If they don't then whatever social network or other services where things can shared/viewed by large groups to millions & are posted publicly need to be labeled "We can not verify veracity of this content."

I want a real internet ..this AI stuff is just triple fold increasing fake crap on the Internet and in turn / time our trust in it!

Re: Artists can poison their pics with deadly Nightshade to deter AI scrapers

#8
post #3

These don't actually work. Adversarial optimization is largely model-specific.

This was the most surprising aspect to me, that such a solution would apparently work robustly? Does the paper cover this?

They claim it's not future proof, but does it actually work now?

Re: Artists can poison their pics with deadly Nightshade to deter AI scrapers

#9
post #8
post #3

These don't actually work. Adversarial optimization is largely model-specific.

This was the most surprising aspect to me, that such a solution would apparently work robustly? Does the paper cover this? They claim it's not future proof, but does it actually work now?

Does it actually work now if you img2img your input files, or do any type of detection that a tool like Nightshade may be in use?
Post reply on HN