Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I made an app people call "Airdrop for Android"

ubidrop.com

1–10 of 150 posts

Re: Show HN: I made an app people call "Airdrop for Android"

#3
Maybe you should update the text on your front page:

> Why not use Android file transfer?

> Android File Transfer is Google's tool for transferring files from your Android to your desktop.

> The tool has not been updated in a long time and feels dated.

> Also, it is 2022 and the future is wireless.

It's not 2022 anymore, and Google just released an update to their Nearby share called Quick share. Or rather, they're adopting Samsung's Quick share.

https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/google-is-adding-samsungs-q...

Re: Show HN: I made an app people call "Airdrop for Android"

#4
A license covers "1 Mac OS device" - what about PC?

Also, what happens once 1 year is up? Any upgrade discounts? Is old version still downloadable?

Anyway, good job, I was in need of something like this recently and used LocalSend https://github.com/localsend/localsend , any notable differences between it and you app?

Re: Show HN: I made an app people call "Airdrop for Android"

#10
Oof! A very cool thing, solving a real problem I have, but if you're taking feedback on pricing: I could never justify paying for local filesharing.

I've been this close to building my own version of something like this, multiple times over (and actually built a browser-based one as a way to learn .net core when that first started), because - like I said - it's a really handy utility.

But I could only justify paying for something premium, like wide area sharing or torrent-like sharing for faster and resumable transfers. To get a file from one device to another can be cumbersome, for sure. But a cable and and an adapter would cost less than your solution, and have benefits (and drawbacks!) of its own. So I just couldn't figure a subscription* for something that, in the worst case, is a tedious pain to set up myself and in the most practical case is replaced by a simple, if cumbersome, process. Maybe others are doing different calculus on this (everyone has their own threshold for 'too much hassle' or 'not accessible enough'), but it's a pass from me without free local sharing.

*not sure what's 'free updates for a year' would mean other than "you will need to pay another $19, to continue receiving updates" which is a subscription, by my definition.

Post reply on HN