Nightshade: An offensive tool for artists against AI art generators

This is excellent. We need more tools like this, for text content as well. For software we need GPL 4 with ML restrictions (make your model open source or not at all). Potentially even DRM for text.

Re: Nightshade: An offensive tool for artists against AI art generators

#6

Post by visarga » Sat, Jan 20, 2024, 3:06 PM UTC

KingOfCoders wrote: post #4

[flagged]

AI is just a tool in someone's hand, there's a human who intends something

Re: Nightshade: An offensive tool for artists against AI art generators

#7

Post by gmerc » Sat, Jan 20, 2024, 3:09 PM UTC

Doing the work to increase OpenAIs moat

Re: Nightshade: An offensive tool for artists against AI art generators

#8

Post by NoraCodes » Sat, Jan 20, 2024, 3:09 PM UTC

KingOfCoders wrote: post #4

[flagged]

This is a tired argument; whether or not the diffusion models are "learning", they are a tool of capital to fuck over human artists, and should be resisted for that reason alone.

Re: Nightshade: An offensive tool for artists against AI art generators

#9

Post by Snow_Falls » Sat, Jan 20, 2024, 3:10 PM UTC

KingOfCoders wrote: post #4

[flagged]

These AIs are not people. They do not learn.

Re: Nightshade: An offensive tool for artists against AI art generators

#10

Post by Quanttek » Sat, Jan 20, 2024, 3:11 PM UTC

This is fantastic. If companies want to create AI models, they should license the content they use for the training data. As long as there are not sufficient legal protections and the EU/Congress do not act, tools like these can serve as a stopgap and maybe help increase pressure on policymakers