Live data from Hacker News

Gmail and Yahoo’s 2024 inbox protections and what they mean for email programs

mailgun.com

1–10 of 279 posts

Re: Gmail and Yahoo’s 2024 inbox protections and what they mean for email programs

#3
Abusive, SPF is plenty enough unless you cannot map the domain with the right IPs due to DNS trickery (rotation, etc), then you would need an IP agnostic way to do some checks, hence the cryptographic DNS based signature.

That said, with no-DNS email addresses, SPF comes for free (alice@[x.x.x.x] bob@[ipv6:...]).

Namely, if SPF does pass, cryptographic DNS based signature mecanisms are excessive and must not be used to score.

Re: Gmail and Yahoo’s 2024 inbox protections and what they mean for email programs

#9
post #3

Abusive, SPF is plenty enough unless you cannot map the domain with the right IPs due to DNS trickery (rotation, etc), then you would need an IP agnostic way to do some checks, hence the cryptographic DNS based signature. That said, with no-DNS email addresses, SPF comes for free (alice@[x.x.x.x] bob@[ipv6:...]). Namely, if SPF does pass, cryptographic DNS based signature mecanisms are excessive and must not be used…

IP addresses get reused, private keys don’t.

Aside from SPF being around first DKIM makes far more sense.

Re: Gmail and Yahoo’s 2024 inbox protections and what they mean for email programs

#10

> These mandates will only affect bulk senders, defined by Google as senders with volumes of 5000 or more messages to Gmail addresses in one day. This is not a requirement for a personal self-hosted email.

If your personal self-hosted email routes outbound messages through a smarthost, it could affect you.
Post reply on HN