Live data from Hacker News

Please Build Me Something Useful: A Letter To Web 2.0 Developers

businesspundit.com

1–10 of 12 posts

Please Build Me Something Useful: A Letter To Web 2.0 Developers

#1
have a confession to make. I have tried out hundreds of Web 2.0 applications, and there is one and only one that I use almost every day. You see, the problem with Web 2.0 is that I'm not a social person.

Please Build Me Something Useful: A Letter To Web 2.0 Developers
businesspundit.com

Re: Please Build Me Something Useful: A Letter To Web 2.0 Developers

#6
It seems like the author would find traditional, client-based applications more useful than server-side Web applications. The whole point of the latter is to use everyone's data to make software more useful, and if he doesn't care about everyone else's input, there's no need to connect to the Web.

Re: Please Build Me Something Useful: A Letter To Web 2.0 Developers

#7
post #2

This must be (by far) the most interesting and unusual piece of text I've ever seen on ycombinator.

My take on the article is that what he needs/wants is a web 2.0 application that would save him time, like a business productivity app.

Re: Please Build Me Something Useful: A Letter To Web 2.0 Developers

#8
I understand his point, but I think he supports it poorly. Of course a product that has 1 review is not likely to benefit greatly from that single review. But when I buy a product, or book a hotel, I look at dozens of reviews from other people and I get a good sense of the pros and cons of what I might buy. I can then gauge those perspectives against what is important to me. And I find that overall they are almost all correct -- in aggregate.

Re: Please Build Me Something Useful: A Letter To Web 2.0 Developers

#9
post #8

I understand his point, but I think he supports it poorly. Of course a product that has 1 review is not likely to benefit greatly from that single review. But when I buy a product, or book a hotel, I look at dozens of reviews from other people and I get a good sense of the pros and cons of what I might buy. I can then gauge those perspectives against what is important to me. And I find that overall they are almost al…

I agree, when I purchase something I look at what other people have complained about. If enough people complain about a particular problem, then I'll evaluate if I think it would bother me.

Re: Please Build Me Something Useful: A Letter To Web 2.0 Developers

#10
post #8

I understand his point, but I think he supports it poorly. Of course a product that has 1 review is not likely to benefit greatly from that single review. But when I buy a product, or book a hotel, I look at dozens of reviews from other people and I get a good sense of the pros and cons of what I might buy. I can then gauge those perspectives against what is important to me. And I find that overall they are almost al…

The point he's making is that the process of aggregating still takes alot of time. The guy simply wants to live his life and spend less time in front of the computer. In that regard this new wave of Web 2.0 is not solving anyone's problems. Online reviews have been around forever, he is aking us to build something new, better, something more useful, in a sense that it won't take you a day of research to buy a new camera, for instance.

Speaking of reviews, I also agree with him that "wisdom of crowds" is overrated. Movie reviews are an excellent example: crowds generally have no freakin taste. Similarly, crowds do not know jack in photography, computers or politics. Dig deep and long enough and you will always disagree with the crowds.

In fact, when someone is unable to conduct his own judgement, asking for the opinion of others is the easiest thing to do,

In that regard Web is 100% focused on helping you with the easiest thing. "Not that helpful" he argues, and I agree.

Post reply on HN