Major pornography site blocks users in NC in response to new law
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Major pornography site blocks users in NC in response to new law
#2Officials explained that companies will be able to use commercially available databases to verify that users are old enough to access their content.
How?
There is no "commercially available database" that can detect if a child is using their parent's name.
There is no "commercially available database" that can detect if a child is using a photo of their parent's ID.
Kids are smarter than conservative lawmakers.
Re: Major pornography site blocks users in NC in response to new law
#3Officials explained that companies will be able to use commercially available databases to verify that users are old enough to access their content. How? There is no "commercially available database" that can detect if a child is using their parent's name. There is no "commercially available database" that can detect if a child is using a photo of their parent's ID. Kids are smarter than conservative lawmakers.
It should be pretty clear from the language what the intent is.
You need to pay their cronies the protection fee or something unfortunate might happen to your porn site.
With a side helping of pandering to the christofascist base, which laps up transparent corruption up as long as they flog the sinners a few times a session.
It is, quite simply, why I left North Carolina.
Re: Major pornography site blocks users in NC in response to new law
#4That porn website is rather clearly trying to manipulate public opinion and strongarm the state to get what it wants.
Kinda like how Facebook strongarmed Canada when it didnt get what it wanted and stopped showing news there.
This is a surreptitious example of megacorps trying to have more power than the people.
Re: Major pornography site blocks users in NC in response to new law
#5That porn website is rather clearly trying to manipulate public opinion and strongarm the state to get what it wants. Kinda like how Facebook strongarmed Canada when it didnt get what it wanted and stopped showing news there. This is a surreptitious example of megacorps trying to have more power than the people.
Are you debating the legality of their strongarming?