Live data from Hacker News

Latent Dictionary: 3D map of Oxford3000+search words via DistilBert embeddings

latentdictionary.com

1–10 of 43 posts

Re: Latent Dictionary: 3D map of Oxford3000+search words via DistilBert embeddings

#6
post #3

Is this with some sort of dimensionality reduction of the embedding space?

In the bottom left "?" button it says it performs PCA down to 3 dimensions. That's going to lose a ton of information, rendering the space mostly useless.

Re: Latent Dictionary: 3D map of Oxford3000+search words via DistilBert embeddings

#7
post #6
post #3

Is this with some sort of dimensionality reduction of the embedding space?

In the bottom left "?" button it says it performs PCA down to 3 dimensions. That's going to lose a ton of information, rendering the space mostly useless.

Yeah, it's a fun useless project.

Re: Latent Dictionary: 3D map of Oxford3000+search words via DistilBert embeddings

#8
I wish there were more context and maybe the ability to do math on the vectors

Eg what is the real distance between the two vectors? That should be easy to compute

Similarly: what do I get from summing two vectors and what are some nearby vectors?

Maybe just generally: what are some nearby vectors?

Without any additional context it's just a point cloud with a couple of randomly labeled elements

Re: Latent Dictionary: 3D map of Oxford3000+search words via DistilBert embeddings

#9

By running the same multiple times, I get different visualization. I don't really understand what's going on, but I like the idea of visualizing embeddings.

I think the PCA dimensionality reduction is non deterministic, but I say this with really low confidence

Re: Latent Dictionary: 3D map of Oxford3000+search words via DistilBert embeddings

#10
post #9

By running the same multiple times, I get different visualization. I don't really understand what's going on, but I like the idea of visualizing embeddings.

I think the PCA dimensionality reduction is non deterministic, but I say this with really low confidence

PCA is purely deterministic (and might not give great results). My guess is this is done by t-sne or UMAP, both of which depend on a seed.
Post reply on HN