Poor Man's Web
zserge.com
Poor Man's Web
1–10 of 82 posts
Re: Poor Man's Web
#2I'm not sure why it's "poor man's" web, other than being minimalistic (text and images only.) I thought the phrase meant something less desirable to use, less capable. But this could be genuinely pleasant!
Re: Poor Man's Web
#3I will keep repeating that in its quest for simplicity Gemini threw the baby out of with the water.
Basic styling and inline images are invaluable.
Re: Poor Man's Web
#4> gem:my.domain.com/hello
Re: Poor Man's Web
#5People keep trying to make Gemini happen. I will keep repeating that in its quest for simplicity Gemini threw the baby out of with the water. Basic styling and inline images are invaluable.
I've taken to writing my markdown and other documetns simiarly. Cory Doctorow does something similar.
https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/20/em-oh-you-ess-ee/#sexytim...
We don't need Gemini. We can get the feeling of the Smol Web by just choosing an effective subset of the features of HTML.
Re: Poor Man's Web
#6Re: Poor Man's Web
#7People keep trying to make Gemini happen. I will keep repeating that in its quest for simplicity Gemini threw the baby out of with the water. Basic styling and inline images are invaluable.
I agree that basic styling and in-line images add something, but I like how Gemini strips so much faff out that the prose and links must stand strongly on their own. I've taken to writing my markdown and other documetns simiarly. Cory Doctorow does something similar. https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/20/em-oh-you-ess-ee/#sexytim... We don't need Gemini. We can get the feeling of the Smol Web by just choosing an effecti…
I don't think that's working at all. Their website is so unapproachable bad, that it fails in selling me reasons why I should even care about this or read further. Letting something standing on its own only really works well if you have a small amount to deliver. Any slightly lengthy text will just bury you in a desert of letters.
Re: Poor Man's Web
#8People keep trying to make Gemini happen. I will keep repeating that in its quest for simplicity Gemini threw the baby out of with the water. Basic styling and inline images are invaluable.
I agree that basic styling and in-line images add something, but I like how Gemini strips so much faff out that the prose and links must stand strongly on their own. I've taken to writing my markdown and other documetns simiarly. Cory Doctorow does something similar. https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/20/em-oh-you-ess-ee/#sexytim... We don't need Gemini. We can get the feeling of the Smol Web by just choosing an effecti…
I feel that if there were some way of promoting a Javascript-free web, everything the world needs is already there in all modern browsers.
I suspect that between HTML5, and indeed XHTML, and CSS and all the many modern image formats and so on, everything important that almost any site needs could be done using these tools and no JS at all.
And the result could also be interpreted and rendered successfully by much smaller simpler browsers, along the lines of Netsurf and Dillo, which are 10% of the size of a full dynamic-content browser or less.
The question is how.
A contest? Make the richest website you can that uses no Javascript, Typescript or anything else, and win a prize as well as promotion?
Re: Poor Man's Web
#9People keep trying to make Gemini happen. I will keep repeating that in its quest for simplicity Gemini threw the baby out of with the water. Basic styling and inline images are invaluable.
I agree that basic styling and in-line images add something, but I like how Gemini strips so much faff out that the prose and links must stand strongly on their own. I've taken to writing my markdown and other documetns simiarly. Cory Doctorow does something similar. https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/20/em-oh-you-ess-ee/#sexytim... We don't need Gemini. We can get the feeling of the Smol Web by just choosing an effecti…