Live data from Hacker News

Intel's Ivy Bridge chips launch using '3D transistors'

bbc.com

1–10 of 17 posts

Re: Intel's Ivy Bridge chips launch using '3D transistors'

#4
post #2

It must be midnight somewhere; the embargos are expiring. Personally, the BBC is the last place I'd look for coverage of processors; you'd probably be better off waiting a few hours for AnandTech or something. (Also, they're called FinFETs.)

No, they're called "Tri-Gate" transistors if you want to nit. FinFET is an industry term, not one Intel uses for this particular process. Both/either are examples of 3D transistor structure, so the linked article isn't wrong.

Re: Intel's Ivy Bridge chips launch using '3D transistors'

#5

I'll be waiting for my nano-microchip in the near future, thank you very much. Enough of this silicon-based stuff!

Silicon is here to stay for the foreseeable future, and for a very simple reason. While we have many advanced possibilities with germanium or carbon nano-tubes or other such advanced processes, silicon is still the cheapest by such a magnitude that it wins out in performance per dollar.

Re: Intel's Ivy Bridge chips launch using '3D transistors'

#6
post #4
post #2

It must be midnight somewhere; the embargos are expiring. Personally, the BBC is the last place I'd look for coverage of processors; you'd probably be better off waiting a few hours for AnandTech or something. (Also, they're called FinFETs.)

No, they're called "Tri-Gate" transistors if you want to nit. FinFET is an industry term, not one Intel uses for this particular process. Both/either are examples of 3D transistor structure, so the linked article isn't wrong.

With some images of each (which I can't judge for accuracy): http://semiaccurate.com/2011/08/18/intel-moves-transistors-f...

Re: Intel's Ivy Bridge chips launch using '3D transistors'

#10

I'll be waiting for my nano-microchip in the near future, thank you very much. Enough of this silicon-based stuff!

Silicon is here to stay for the foreseeable future, and for a very simple reason. While we have many advanced possibilities with germanium or carbon nano-tubes or other such advanced processes, silicon is still the cheapest by such a magnitude that it wins out in performance per dollar.

Blank CDs were pretty expensive at one point.
Post reply on HN