Dotcss - tweak the web (based on dotjs) • Hacker News Board

Dotcss - tweak the web (based on dotjs)

#1

Post by andrewstewart » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 2:05 AM UTC

Dotcss - tweak the web (based on dotjs)
github.com

Re: Dotcss - tweak the web (based on dotjs)

#2

Post by Trezoid » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 2:44 AM UTC

Stylish[1] exists on both chrome and firefox, on all OS's with no other requirements and a gallery of nearly 50,000 styles with support for variables.

I don't really see how something limited to a single OS/Browser combo is particularly useful by comparison.

[1]http://userstyles.org/

Re: Dotcss - tweak the web (based on dotjs)

#3

Post by wamatt » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 3:23 AM UTC

Trezoid wrote: post #2

Stylish[1] exists on both chrome and firefox, on all OS's with no other requirements and a gallery of nearly 50,000 styles with support for variables. I don't really see how something limited to a single OS/Browser combo is particularly useful by comparison. [1] http://userstyles.org/

Agreed, or userscripts.

Re: Dotcss - tweak the web (based on dotjs)

#4

Post by simonster » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 5:55 AM UTC

I know it's Google's fault, and not the author's, but creating an environment where users need to run a web server to access local files strikes me as extremely stupid. I can't imagine a situation where this is more secure than a proper API could be, and I can imagine several situations where it isn't (e.g., if the server has a security vulnerability, or more trivially, if there are multiple users on the same machine and the data is private).

Re: Dotcss - tweak the web (based on dotjs)

#5

Post by christiangenco » Mon, Apr 23, 2012, 7:32 AM UTC

Trezoid wrote: post #2

Stylish[1] exists on both chrome and firefox, on all OS's with no other requirements and a gallery of nearly 50,000 styles with support for variables. I don't really see how something limited to a single OS/Browser combo is particularly useful by comparison. [1] http://userstyles.org/

I think the advantage lies in being able to use your own editor as opposed to the clunky in-browser editor in stylish or tedious copy/pasting between each iteration. I'd much rather work with this when developing new styles.