Twerps?
What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
#2Post-merger
Re: What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
#3Tweets. Only an idiot would throw away that kind off brand recognition.
Re: What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
#4xits pronounced zits
Re: What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
#5The rebranding is one of the most stupid things I've seen business-wise during my adult life.
I still go to twitter dot com. And I call them tweets, and everyone does that.
I do personally enjoy saying "X formerly known as Twitter" though.
Re: What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
#6The rebranding is one of the most stupid things I've seen business-wise during my adult life. I still go to twitter dot com. And I call them tweets, and everyone does that. I do personally enjoy saying "X formerly known as Twitter" though.
ex-Twitter
Re: What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
#7Xcrement
Re: What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
#8Post-merger
Maybe it was a combination of merger and murder. It was an acquisition then a rebrand anyway, not a merger.
Re: What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
#9Re: What should X/Twitter have called tweets post-murger
#10Mistakes