A South Korean woman who adopted her best friend
aljazeera.com
A South Korean woman who adopted her best friend
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: A South Korean woman who adopted her best friend
#2It always seemed to me that instead of fighting over definition of a marriage, governments should just generalize to some kind of civil union to allow broader scope of living arrangements to benefit from recognition and protection. Two (or more) people sharing livelihood doesn't need to be based on sex or kinship. Adoption is just a crude workaround for the lack of the right civil law abstraction.
Re: A South Korean woman who adopted her best friend
#3It always seemed to me that instead of fighting over definition of a marriage, governments should just generalize to some kind of civil union to allow broader scope of living arrangements to benefit from recognition and protection. Two (or more) people sharing livelihood doesn't need to be based on sex or kinship. Adoption is just a crude workaround for the lack of the right civil law abstraction.
I agree, but there needs to be some legal distinction between 'union' and 'guardianship'. The latter probably should be harder to dissolve.
Re: A South Korean woman who adopted her best friend
#4It always seemed to me that instead of fighting over definition of a marriage, governments should just generalize to some kind of civil union to allow broader scope of living arrangements to benefit from recognition and protection. Two (or more) people sharing livelihood doesn't need to be based on sex or kinship. Adoption is just a crude workaround for the lack of the right civil law abstraction.
Yeah, I wonder why people want government-sanctioned
marriage nowadays except for... Tax?
Re: A South Korean woman who adopted her best friend
#5It always seemed to me that instead of fighting over definition of a marriage, governments should just generalize to some kind of civil union to allow broader scope of living arrangements to benefit from recognition and protection. Two (or more) people sharing livelihood doesn't need to be based on sex or kinship. Adoption is just a crude workaround for the lack of the right civil law abstraction.
Yeah, I wonder why people want government-sanctioned marriage nowadays except for... Tax?
There are a lot of legal and healthcare reasons to have the government recognize your partner. Things like:
- Having someone able to make medical decisions when you're incapacitated
- Insurance coverage and other entitlements from a partner's employee benefits
- Power of attorney
- Social security entitlements
- In some jurisdictions, to inherit property after death instead of it going to children or even the state
- For people in the military, a variety of valuable benefits that can mean the difference between living in a shared barracks room and living in a house off-base