Grading job candidates via Github API
1–10 of 35 posts
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#2«We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#3Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#4Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
I didn't even make their first tier at < 10k
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#5Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#6Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#7Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
And sadly, that score will keep some people from applying for a job/internship they would be qualified for.
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#8Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
And sadly, that score will keep some people from applying for a job/internship they would be qualified for.
But this is of course at the discretion of Divio.
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#9Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
yeah, It's not clear to me what their criteria could possibly be. Their own employees seemed to have scored decently well, while heavy weights did terrible. I didn't even make their first tier at < 10k
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#10[deleted]