Gemini Pro vs. GPT3.5
klu.ai
Gemini Pro vs. GPT3.5
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Gemini Pro vs. GPT3.5
#2Spoiler: it's fast, cheap, overly protective, and has Kafkaesque DX
Re: Gemini Pro vs. GPT3.5
#3This "vibe" check that it's even better than GPT-4 Turbo is not what its Elo rating shows on the Chatbot Arena based on not 1 but thousands of user votes.
GPT-4 (Turbo) is in a league of its own still.
Re: Gemini Pro vs. GPT3.5
#4This "vibe" check that it's even better than GPT-4 Turbo is not what its Elo rating shows on the Chatbot Arena based on not 1 but thousands of user votes. GPT-4 (Turbo) is in a league of its own still.
The vibe check is for pro tho. I want to see how ultra is benchmarked.
Re: Gemini Pro vs. GPT3.5
#5This "vibe" check that it's even better than GPT-4 Turbo is not what its Elo rating shows on the Chatbot Arena based on not 1 but thousands of user votes. GPT-4 (Turbo) is in a league of its own still.
By its nature, that site isn't very representative of how the models perform in real-world use.
Re: Gemini Pro vs. GPT3.5
#6This "vibe" check that it's even better than GPT-4 Turbo is not what its Elo rating shows on the Chatbot Arena based on not 1 but thousands of user votes. GPT-4 (Turbo) is in a league of its own still.
By its nature, that site isn't very representative of how the models perform in real-world use.
The ELO leaderboard you mean?
Re: Gemini Pro vs. GPT3.5
#7This "vibe" check that it's even better than GPT-4 Turbo is not what its Elo rating shows on the Chatbot Arena based on not 1 but thousands of user votes. GPT-4 (Turbo) is in a league of its own still.
By its nature, that site isn't very representative of how the models perform in real-world use.
That depends on what real world use you're targeting, but unfortunately I'm not aware of anything better than that leaderboard in terms of sample size and model coverage.