E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
washingtonpost.com
E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
#2Re: E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
#3Re: E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
#4And once again we are reminded why large technical advances happen outside of the EU
Re: E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
#5I'm starting to think that the US senate is a feature and not a bug.
Re: E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
#6Re: E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
#7And once again we are reminded why large technical advances happen outside of the EU
Which advancements are you thinking of? The two decade long development of Meta's untamed surveillance apparatus?
Re: E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
#8And once again we are reminded why large technical advances happen outside of the EU
I think the EU is a way behind because of a lack of investment in startups.
Edit:
Like 90% of de audio dev industry is in Europe (Native instruments, Ableton, Steinberg, UVI, Arturia, etc).
Re: E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
#9And once again we are reminded why large technical advances happen outside of the EU
I doubt regulations are the issue. In fact the internet was invented at CERN and plenty of unicorns started the in the EU (Spotify, Skype, etc). I think the EU is a way behind because of a lack of investment in startups. Edit: Like 90% of de audio dev industry is in Europe (Native instruments, Ableton, Steinberg, UVI, Arturia, etc).
In fact, it was not.
Re: E.U. reaches deal on landmark AI bill, racing ahead of U.S.
#10It's easy to be generous with other people's technological advancements. I'm starting to think that the US senate is a feature and not a bug.
"And I hear Americans saying this nowadays, and there's a lot of it going around. They talk about a "dysfunctional government" because there's disagreement.
And the Framers would have said, "Yes, that's exactly the way we set it up. We wanted this to be power contradicting power -- because the main ill that beset us" -- as Hamilton said in The Federalist when he talked about a separate Senate -- He said, "Yes, it seems inconvenient, but inasmuch as the main ill that besets us is an excess of legislation, it won't be so bad."
This is 1787 -- he didn't know what an excess of legislation was."